'To know where you are and where you are going, it helps enormously to know where you have come from. Indeed it is essential.' David Icke, 'Children of the Matrix'

Part One

The past, especially the ancient and human past, was a fascination to me from an early age. And the allure of the topic arose precisely from the considerations communicated by David Icke in the quote above.

In my teens I came upon the writings of Robert Ardrey. He researched early humans beings, and followed the newly-emerging ideas about humans originating in Africa. Furthermore, he posited from the evidence that the earliest humans were not peace-loving semi-apes at all. Instead, they were intent on forming hierarchies of dominance, and were capable of great violence should the need arise.

For a while I was sold on Ardrey. His theories were not exactly welcome, but seemed to make sense in the light of what some human history was all about. In an Ardrey-inspired familial tussle for male superiority, I once accused my father of 'head of the family dominance' and he nearly disowned me for it.

It was later on that I began to wonder whether this approach really had a lot to commend it. It was a search for humanity's 'true nature', and your 'findings' appeared to depend to a fair degree on your own preconceptions and dispositions. Did any 'true nature' in this way actually exist? I began to doubt it. The killer ape. The loving ape. The stoned ape (see Terence McKenna). The jealous ape. All and none.

Part Two

Not everything that happens in history is 'conspiracy'. Neither does everything take place by chance, randomly, or as the result of the winning through of the best solution. Or as a consequence of any mysterious force such as 'evolution', either. One way to see events is as a mixture - which may become a battle - between the planned, the programmed, the 'conspiratorial', on the one hand, and the workings of the free human spirit and of free will on the other. Very roughly and broadly.

What becomes accepted, acceptable, the norm, may well fall short of a conspiracy out of thin air. It can be the result of the adoption of an idea, a theory, which is most convenient for those who wish to control others. Along with the concurrent suppression of opposing 'inconvenient' viewpoints.

Take health, for example, and the germ theory vs terrain theory dichotomy, which has come to special prominence since the advent of the current bug story. When we get down to the assumptions underlying each of them, the question of which one will be ridiculed and dismissed, and which will be promoted relentlessly, becomes a no-brainer.

Terrain theory emphasises the individual, and personal responsibility for health; it stresses diet, other factors of lifestyle, emotional and spiritual well-being. It is, to use that word, empowering. Look after yourself, be wise: this is the prime factor in personal health, and in terrain theory. 

Germ theory, by contrast, sees health far more in terms of dangerous little things 'out there', which are waiting for the slightest opportunity to jump on helpless little you and make you very sick. The individual's power in this situation is very small: the world out there is big and dangerous, so 'health' is primarily about countering the bugs, the infections, the viruses. The individual is essentially a helpless victim in a vicious world. It's the mentality which has won through, and conveniently for the conspirators, has led to a world where vast numbers of people cower inside their houses, afraid to venture into the fresh air, and just wait in quiet despair for salvation, which comes in the form of a mystery substance in an injection. 

Another example concerns a guy with a beard and a notebook, who went travelling and ended up looking at tortoises. His theories - especially with a little twisting and distortion - suit the cabal down to the ground. Survival of the fittest: a fantastic theory to justify war, disharmony, constant strife between peoples, domination, control. When it comes to the deep history of human beings, I suggest that Darwin's ideas are roughly 100% bullshit. The story of humans just ain't like that, the evolution of the smart ape from the stupid ape. As we shall see eventually. No matter; it's the adopted theory of choice for those who would be in control.

Part Three

How far can we go down the conspiracy alleyway? How many nooks and crannies does the agenda of control penetrate? 

I don't recall a lot that I apparently learnt during my three years 'studying' geography at university. This is partly because it's not worth remembering. One subject which proved slightly more stimulating, however, was the history of geology and geomorphology (the shape of the landscapes etc). A central figure in this story is one James Hutton (1726 -1797). The Scot is often referred to as 'the father of modern geology'. Along with Charles Lyell (1797 - 1875), he brought to prominence the notion of 'uniformitarianism' with regard to the formation of the features of the Earth's surface. 

Before Hutton, the consensus was that what we see nowadays is largely the result of catastrophes: volcanoes, earthquakes, great floods, comets, etc. And following the lead of the Bible, the Earth was very young. Hutton and Lyell turned all this around. What we see now, they proclaimed, has been produced by the same gradual processes which are in evidence today: wind and water erosion; frost action; the slow accumulation of the effects of water in rivers, seas, and rain. And it's all been going on for an awfully long time.

When I cast my eye over such matters in the 1970s, it was all Hutton. 'Catastrophe' has been allowed a minor re-entry since then, in the shape of the very occasional dinosaur-deleting asteroid, for example. But cataclysmic change still takes a back seat.

So the point is this. What if - just what if - our history had indeed been deeply influenced by catastrophic events? And in the not-too distant past. And what if those catastrophic changes involved elements that certain people wanted to keep unknown? Secret. Forbidden. For example, that human civilisation was once more advanced both spiritually and technologically than today, and that those achievements have been hidden or deliberately destroyed. And that various non-human and/or extra-terrestrial beings were involved in the whole thing - and that they continue  to be involved behind the scenes. If so, would you champion catastrophe theory? Or would you promote Hutton and his peaceful erosions?

Part Four 

I enjoy listening to the histories of humans as told on Cosmic Agency and Pleiadian Knowledge. I have heard them all several times. 

The history as told in these places is very different from anything found in books that are read in schools and universities. It bears many similarities with what is related by David Icke in, for example, 'Children of the Matrix'; there are also considerable differences. Very briefly, the history of humans on Earth goes like this:

Humans originate, not on Earth, but in the constellation of Lyra. Darwinian evolution doesn't come into it, and neither does 'intelligent design' - false dichotomy. Humans as we know them did not evolve from apes or australopithecus or anything else. Different human-types co-habited here. The elusive 'missing link' has not been discovered and never will be, because it doesn't exist.

The human is an emotional type of being, and has a strong connection to Source, two characteristics which some other, more mentally and technologically advanced non-human races lack. But the humans in Lyra were hunted down relentlessly by certain non-emotional (to us, psychopathic) reptilian beings. They were chased around the galaxy, slaughtered, in places almost to extinction.   

A number of Lyrans took refuge on planet Earth, which was simultaneously visited by other interstellar races, both benevolent and malevolent. Advanced civilisations developed, with technology and spiritual knowledge far beyond that of the present day. Atlantis, Lemuria. But reptilians and other predatory races continued their games.

A great catastrophe occurred when the good and the bad guys had an enormous blow-out, one which resulted in the destruction of the planet Tiamat, located between Mars and Saturn. This was a watery planet, and some of the fallout reached Earth, leading to cataclysm, especially flood, and the decimation of the civilisations here - hence the underwater ruins of pyramids etc which can be found in various places on Earth.

Since then, it has been service as normal. Humanity has picked itself up off the ground to an extent, but the pattern of its existence has been constantly manipulated by those non-human forces of malevolent intent. 

A picture emerges of a humanity being chased down, hunted, beaten up. Until today, when the effects of these thousands of years seem to have come to a head in 'the current situation'. Human beings have been exploited, used, and effectively transformed into a slave race - no exaggeration. Which is where I came in, really....

It was last summer when the realisation began to trickle through uncomfortably: I was witnessing the life - or twilight existence - of a predominantly slave race. Even more clearly now. Here is an example. It's eight months since the mask mandates came in: folk 'told' to mask up if they want to buy a parsnip. Completely ludicrous, as you'll discover if you dig out any proper research; and obviously psychologically manipulative, intended to demean and develop submission, as you'll discover if you watch dispassionately. But most people continue, happily it appears. They believe some story about saving the world from a dread disease by covering their face with a piece of toxic plastic to go buy their shopping. 

The same goes for any other 'measures' introduced to stamp out the bug. The way that the majority of folk comply willingly, uncritically with all this stuff could lead to only one - disturbing- conclusion: the default position of the majority of human beings is one of unthinking obedience, of automatic submission to authority. We are concerned with, de facto, a race that has become habituated to the status of slavery.

It's a subtle point, maybe for another time. Slaves, but not victims. Life is one of co-creation. No point in just ranting: "It's all the reptilians." It takes two to tango. On a more esoteric level, a slave is a slave because a slave has signed up to be one. No playing the victim - victimiser game. Abuser and abused exist in a conspiracy of mutuality. 

Part Five 

Interestingly (for me) there is something critical which both students of the Flat Earth and non-human/ET researchers and contactees may typically agree upon. To generalise broadly, they will have many metaphysical and cosmological differences. Nevertheless, both will wholeheartedly reject the view of scientific orthodoxy of the place of humans in the cosmos.

This mainstream interpretation sees human life as puny, helpless, and sometimes hopeless, without meaning. Humans flounder around desperately and in isolation on this spinning ball hurtling wildly through space. In contrast, the Flat Earther and the ET researcher see humans as having significance, meaning. They are not alone and isolated - that is the delusional story fed to humanity by the mainstream about themselves, to purposely demean them. Instead, they have their part to play; they are connected, one part of a far greater and magnificent whole. They can - just - be lifted up from their state of slavery, back to their state of wholeness, connection to the spiritual, their inherent love and wisdom remembered, restored. Such is the task at hand today..... 

Links: The forbidden history videos from Cosmic Agency and Pleiadian Knowledge are here:

https://swaruu.org

https://lbry.tv/@CosmicAgency:c

Some relevant videos are: 'The Orion Wars,1-4', on Pleiadian Knowledge (July 8th, Aug 8th, Dec 10th 2020, Feb 12th 2021). 'Atlantis, Lemuria, Reptilians etc' on Cosmic Agency, Nov 2nd 2020. All these videos can be found on swaruu.org, in the 'transcripts' section, where the contents can be watched and read. They are also on YouTube.

To some people, this may all appear ludicrous. However, I guarantee you that it is infinitely less ludicrous than common-day activities such as taking seriously a single word uttered by the likes of Hancock, Sturgeon, Whittie, SAGE (Sadistic Agency for Generating Emergencies) and others in their club. That is true madness.