Blog#73: On the Inside, Looking Out...
Part One
A prisoner may learn many things. Very quickly, any prisoner worth their salt will discover how to deal with the jailers and wardens: what to say, what not to say, how to minimise confrontation and worse. The prisoner will also learn as rapidly as possible how to exist in the company of the other prisoners, and how to avoid being picked on, bullied, victimised, abused, beaten up, and again worse.
A prisoner may learn how to deal with long hours of nothing, without dying of boredom. The prisoner may take up writing, producing things that otherwise would not have seen the light of day. He or she may engage in reading, and educate themselves in ways they otherwise would not imagine. They may get to make new friends among the fellow prisoners, and help them out if needed. In this way, the prisoner might begin to look beyond their own immediate preferences and concerns, and to be of some benefit to other human beings.
Thus, being a prisoner may provide many experiences for learning. It would, however, be the height of folly to therefore conclude that the purpose of prisons is to help people to learn, and to grow. No. The purpose of a prison is to punish, and to isolate the prisoner from the rest of humanity.
So the same is true for life on planet Earth. Many of we humans who have turned up here learn quite a lot. Some learn very quickly. But this does not mean that the purpose of human life on this planet is education. The learning is a by-product, at times a necessary by-product, of living here as a kind of prisoner.
The prime purpose of human life is to be a prisoner in this place, and to generate low vibrational energy (loosh) for the manufacturers of this realm. New Age advocates take note; many other modern spiritual types take note; followers of certain Hindu-style traditions take note; various Christian folk take note. The fact that we learn, and we may even learn a lot, does not mean that this is the reason for our existence here. It by no means justifies the state of affairs that humans and other life forms find themselves in on this planet. Let's apply a little logic, folks....
And there will, of course, be a small number of prisoners who spend their time trying to find a way to escape, never to return....
Part Two
'Question everything', that's the maxim. The problem is that some things seem so much part of the furniture, so much a part of the fabric of life, that it doesn't even occur to us to question them.
Once such 'given by the universe' truth concerns diseases and viruses. I mean, viruses produce illnesses, don't they? We all know that, it's obvious. We've known this since we could understand language. It's true because it's what we've been told, and told again; it's what we therefore believe, an assumption based on obvious facts. Isn't it?
It never occurred to me to question anything about viruses. Why should I? They obviously exist, the way that hamsters and giraffes and banana trees exist.
The first tremor to be felt in Fort Virus was four years ago, when I sat down to watch David Icke speaking to Brian Rose about the unfolding convid situation, and since when life has never been quite the same. I recall vividly David sitting there, and calmly enunciating those immortal words: 'There is no virus.'
He was, of course, talking about convid 19 specifically, rather than viruses in general. But it was enough to dent the foundational belief that the basis of what we are told about the genesis of disease is necessarily correct.
As I continued to listen and read in that urgent pursuit of truth, I came across people who denied the existence, not only of a convid 19 virus producing a plandemic of unprecedented proportions; but denied the existence of viruses as agents of disease altogether.
What? How could it be? And I began to humbly realise that my belief in viruses as primary contagions was nothing I had personally investigated. It was one of the beliefs that I had taken on from childhood, and which had progressively gained more prominence in the explanation of illness as the years had passed. The virus theory of disease is a programmed system of belief for most of us, nothing more; including, up to that point, me.
I informed myself of what a number of experienced health practitioners had to say, people like Andrew Kaufman and Tom Cowans; excellent, articulate, courageous people. I learned a lot. And the most important thing I learned was that the entire virus theory of disease is built on shaky ground indeed.
People think that you can see viruses if you look through a microscope. Wrong! They think that the convid 19 virus looks like a round ball with tubey spikes on it. Wrong again! Something proved to be a virus has never been seen with a microscope. There are bits of stuff that some people may say 'Look, that's the virus', but my research suggests that those bits are actually waste material, or what the body produces as part of the detox process, bits called exosomes, and not disease-causing things at all.
The process of 'isolation' of a virus is a bizarre thing. It's not what it sounds like at all. Some dude in a laboratory has not just taken a bit of diseased tissue, chucked away all the other substances, and hey presto! - there's a the virus! Not at all. So-called 'isolation' involves mixing a bit of unhealthy tissue with other stuff, like antibiotics, starving it, doing various other abnormal things to it, eventually ending up with something that is not in good shape at all, then pronouncing it a virus.
The process was finally carried out by Stefan Lanka on healthy tissue, and after all the abuse of foresaid tissue, he ended up with the same mess that is proclaimed as viral as do the lab folk with already diseased tissue.
Nowadays viruses and new variants are 'discovered' through computer modelling. To me, this means that you can invent a new disease or variant of a disease whenever you want, merely by tweaking a bit of software. It's all ridiculous.
The info exists out there on the dodgy nature of virus existence for anyone who dares to look. Last summer I watched a five-part, seven-hour video series called 'the Viral Delusion', which goes into many things. I saw it on Ickonic, but I think it can be accessed elsewhere. There is Tom Cowans's book (which I have not read), stuff on Anita Baxas's substack, Andrew Kaufman material, and others I have not looked into.
And here is a recent article, which is a well-organised and instructive source on the subject:
I recommend highly taking a few minutes to go through this comprehensive article.
The virus theory has been around for quite a while, but it has come to greater prominence during my lifetime. Feel ill? For some people, everything's a virus nowadays.
The virus theory of illness is highly significant, because it is the gateway to massive intervention by Big Pharma. Endless supply of viruses = endless supply of vaxenes and other anti-viral products, straight from the factory.
The psychological effects of excess belief in viruses are devastating. The chickens really came home to roost on this one during the convid plandemic. Countless people cowering behind their sofa as the dreaded virus came stomping down the street, into the front garden, and through the letterbox into your living room. Virus theory promotes a sense of fear and helplessness in the face of ill health. 'You' are powerless in the equation. All power lies with the virus, and you are nothing.
The climate of fear produced by this psychological dynamic makes people susceptible to anything that, they are told, will alleviate the situation, regardless of how stupid and reckless the 'solution' actually is, if you can only drop the fear for five minutes and see what is actually going on. Untested, unapproved, new 'science' injections, anyone?
Through virus theory a human being learns to abdicate personal responsibility for their own health, and give it all over to 'the experts', 'the authorities'. They have basically disowned their own life, and given it over to people in white coats and dark suits. How clever is that? I'm not saying that taking personal responsibility for your own body will be a cure-all, not at all. But I am saying that taking your own health, as your own life, more into your own hands, can achieve much. But a self-empowered individual is anathema to the System, which depends on abject acceptance of everything it proposes about how the world works.
Note: From what I have seen, there is far more evidence of other forms of infection, such as bacterial and fungal, than from viruses. Bacteria do seem to be real things, and can actually make you ill. The debate is sometimes presented as 'germ theory versus terrain theory'. This can sometimes be another divide-and-rule polarity, and can easily throw up simplistic black-and-white arguments. Which are not very helpful. But the general question about health is this: should the emphasis be on viruses and nasty stuff attacking us, or on the environment, both in the outside world and in the physical body itself?
