Part One

There is a fairly rapidly increasing volume of resources available on the topic, but these are my 'Trap Three': David Icke, Isabella Greene, and Howdie Mickoski. All on the track of the same beast, all with their individual angles and insights into 'the topic of topics.'

First acquaintance with Howdie was through his book 'Exit the Cave', which I read late summer/early autumn last year. It's a fairly slim volume, but it is a foundational text for anybody wishing to explore the reincarnation soul trap. 

From one perspective, the subject matter of 'Exit the Cave' is a bit of a hotch-potch. Some is philosophical, some highly (and admittedly by Howdie) speculative; there is a short story based on looking at some Italian Renaissance art; and there is quite a bit of material around various films that Howdie takes as relevant (more specifically, as describing the simulated reality which we inhabit).

Some of 'Exit the Cave' I have read twice; some of the sections on cinema probably won't get much of a re-look, as I don't watch many films anyway, and some are for the specialist film buff. '.....' :ever heard of them? Me neither.

I have also watched some presentations by and interviews with Howdie. Some are short, some are full 60 - 90 minute chats on YouTube channels, and a particularly good one on Ickonic in the 'Classified' series. Howdie can be philosophical, and seems to enjoy speculation.

To begin with, he struck me as a bit fatalistic about it all, as if he has been somewhat overwhelmed by the immensity of what he has discovered about reality. 'Just do your best in this life, help out a bit where you can, and prepare for the time of death, which is the great opportunity to escape from this matrix once and for all.'

I wondered whether his attitude is influenced by the traumas which he experienced earlier in life (detailed more fully in one of his previous books, an autobiography, which I will probably read one day to help fill out the picture). Having said that, he comes across as a kind, intelligent, and sensitive person, modest in a positive way, and somebody you would be pleased to meet and communicate with.     

Howdie expands his research into different areas, some of which I hold insufficient interest in personally, and which I will probably never explore. But he goes into history a lot - how real is what we are told about the past, even the fairly recent past? One topic that is worthy of delving into is that of the great world fairs of the 19th century, which were big things and a big deal, but little-known today. What was all that about?

Howdie also describes in more detail than others how the simulation might actually work. It is not, he suggests, a constant thing, but is continually refining the way it operates in the name of greater efficiency (ie of creation and extraction of energy, specifically what is referred to as loosh). It is an enormous digital programme, and acts in the same way that Windows does: Windows 8, then the 'improved' Windows 10, Windows 11, etc. These changes in the simulation are 'resets'.

There are occasional big resets, such as we are witnessing at the moment (for example, Klaus Schwab and the Great Reset). But there are numerous smaller ones as well. Viewed from this perspective, human history makes more sense. For example, World War Two marks the time when the simulation began to overtly go global, and we see the formation of institutions such as the United Nations and the germinal EU (not truly global, but transnational and with the same underlying mentality, of superseding nation states with something 'bigger'). 

So I suggest that it is worth checking out a few of Howdie's videos on YouTube and his own channel. And getting hold of 'Exit the Cave.' 

Part Two 

The thing is this. If we dare for five minutes to actually consider that what we inhabit is not part of the natural order of things, but an artificially-constructed simulation with specific aims, then lots of things begin to make sense.

What is the purpose to our existence? Does it have a purpose? Such considerations have been the preoccupation of philosophers, theologians, and people sitting in cafes drinking coffee for centuries. Some people, like me, have devoted the best part of their life to the attempt to unravel the riddle, the mystery, but often to little avail. Theologians have debated and raged, and the end result? Nobody has a clue. Does it not seems odd that this most basic of questions is so impervious to answering?

And isn't it strange that there are enormous numbers of humans on this planet nowadays, all going about their daily activities, which they treat as so important. Yet they have little or no idea of why they are doing it all in the first place. Some may offer beliefs that they've cadged from some holy book or another, but that's not what I am talking about. I am talking about a proper inner knowing.

You might almost end up wondering whether the truth is being deliberately kept from people. Maybe the truth is so weird, so outrageous, so offending to intelligent and sensitive people, that it must remain hidden at all costs. Could this be the root purpose of all the censorship and so on which is rife today?

Maybe the seekers get nowhere because the basic premise on which their research takes place is false. Everybody, pretty much, proceeds on the assumption that the world we inhabit is part of the natural order of things: that there is a uniform way that everything works. But what if that assumption is wrong? That the way of things on planet Earth is in truth an anomaly, an aberration; that it is a 'bad copy', as some Gnostics called it, of the real, natural 'god-given', order of things. A kind of artificial bubble shaped by an energy or an entity that pretends to be the real creator of everything, but in reality can only engage in large-scale copy-and-paste procedures.

Take the question of suffering. It is everywhere. I feel suffering keenly enough, but I have it lucky. Consider the lot of many humans, and it doesn't make you feel good.

Buddhism proposes that suffering, or at least unsatisfactoriness, duhkha, is the hallmark of unenlightened existence. Fair enough: good analysis. But when it comes to the question of 'why is it like that in the first place?' it appears to adopt avoidance tactics. Which I find a bit suspicious.

In more modern UFO/ET and new agey circles, there is much discussion on the theme of the purpose of life - or of the purpose of coming to Earth specifically, when there are apparently so many nicer places in the cosmos that souls could hang out. In other words: what the hell are we doing here in the first place?! 

One proposal is that souls come here 'for the experience'. For some reason that I fail to grasp, a happy consciousness determines that it would be interesting to come for a bit of rape, torture, abuse, and genocide. Sorry, I don't get that.

Another common idea (and I have researched but failed to find out where these beliefs come from) is that we come here to learn lessons. Earth is a great university, and its difficult nature is what makes it such a great learning opportunity. So you will hear people in that new age-type world repeat this notion all the time, as a piece of new age dogma that is self-evident, it doesn't require discussion.

It's the same thing. Pain, difficulty, suffering, creates the opportunity for learning. 'I really want to learn, to advance' says the enthusiastic soul of a newly-deceased. 'Give me Earth. Give me some of that rape, torture, abuse, and genocide. That'll really help me move on.'

What the soul in this fantasy does not digest is that it also subscribes to reincarnation and the memory wipe. After each life, the memory is wiped; this amnesia is necessary for the next incarnation and its lessons to seem more real, to be taken more seriously, so we are told. I suggest that this is a nefarious doctrine. That soul has been through the theatre of rape, torture etc hundreds of times, and on each occasion it has forgotten on the death of the physical body, thanks to the after-life memory wipe. So what has it learnt from all this horror? Er, roughly..... nothing.

The endless round of suffering makes sense only if we shift our focus from 'part of the natural order of things' to 'artificial system intended to entrap souls and keep them in misery.' Then all kind of other things come up for investigation. The laws of physics, for example. Are these really universal laws, or are they simply the variables built into our simulated programme? Is the speed of light a constant throughout cosmoses, or is it the processing speed of our artificially-induced matrix? 

Take a walk around - in nature is best - and pay close attention to what you see and hear. Increasingly I experience that it is not a 'god-given' natural world. Instead, I am witnessing a broadcast......  

For another example of how seeing this world as a simulation fashioned with evil intent changes things, watch this ten-minute video:  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOscoqUPqnU