I've written about this before. My initiation into the notion ('notion'?  - the truth, more like...) that the world isn't the way we are told it is through the official channels.

It was soon after bailing out from big city life in London to the contrasting mountain-and-water ambience of Highland Scotland in 2005. I came, in part, for the mountains, the wild places. No sooner had we arrived than I set to exploring the magic embodied in the hills and lochs of northern Scotland.

I was conscious that, following me up the A9 from the populated Central Belt of Scotland, was the germinal but soon rapidly expanding industry of the wind farms. They were soon threatening to impinge upon, if not completely take over, some of the most precious and beautiful areas of (relative) wilderness that exist in Scotland.

Instinctively I disliked the wind farms. Yet we were being told, ad nauseam, that they were essential if we were ever going to stop this global warming, which would create havoc for everyone and everything if left unchecked.

I had my doubts: about the efficacy of the turbine programme, and about the entire human-made climate change story. I was, nevertheless, sincerely open to possibilities. If wind farms on the moors and mountains was what was needed to save the polar bears, then so be it. The loss of landscape would be a sacrifice worth making.

I began to do my own research, and surprising facts began to emerge. The invasion of the wind farms made no sense, either economically or environmentally. In both instances it was a disaster. 

At the very least, there was a strong case against the metal monsters marching across the Scottish hillsides. And this was the most serious aspect to the whole matter: why weren't we hearing that case? It was never brought up in most mainstream circles, let alone debated (there was a small number of exceptions, e.g. in the Daily Telegraph, but they were marginalised and dismissed by the mainstream of the mainstream).

These were the days when I might drop into something like 'Newsnight' on BBC in the hope of some illumination about current affairs. Energy policy, renewables, were on the menu on an almost daily basis. The necessity of the wind farm revolution was pushed down peoples' gullet constantly by the likes of Ed Miliband. 

Actually, Ed was not quite so bad. At least he was, in a manner of speaking, an elected official. But the others who would regale themselves on these programmes were anything but. They were all members of Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Worldwide Foundation. Renewable energy companies and consortiums. Think tanks and other NGOs. Nobody voted for them. Who asked for their opinion?

And amongst all this, there was never - never - a proper interview with one of the (even then many) doubters and dissenters. Why not? It was a reasonable question to ask. 

Slowly it dawned on me. There was never any intention of informed debate. If there was, the whole wind farm debacle would come tumbling down like a pack of cards. No. These television programmes were not meant to provide open questioning. Their aim was to brainwash the general public into believing in the desirability of certain agendas, and the undesirability of others.

All of this took place behind the facade of pretend discussion and debate, the fakery of information and democracy. Nowadays the process has become hardened into the motto 'the science is settled', whether it be global warming or safety and effectiveness of waxenes. A real scientist will know: the science is never settled. 'Progress' is impossible on the assumption of 'settled science'. Think about it. 

Sorry to report, but all the predictions of the wind farm dissenters have come to pass. Sky-high energy prices, absence of energy security, constant fear of the lights going out, unaccountable people in metaphorical dark suits getting stinking rich at the expense of the general public. And then there's the animals....

I knew that wind farms were detrimental, but fifteen years ago I did not imagine the true shadow of darkness that their blood-stained blades would cast over the natural world. Here is a video. It's not all brilliantly-made, in my view, but it's worth watching I suggest. And then there's another interesting article below.     

https://public.substack.com/p/the-film-that-could-save-an-entire

https://expose-news.com/2023/09/20/waning-sun-instantly-flushes-climate-alarmists/

And while we are on the topic, here's another one. I have come across this idea before, but this article is very timely. I find it extremely interesting....

https://expose-news.com/2023/10/01/great-oil-conspiracy-oil-is-not-a-fossil-fuel/

It took me a while; but once I accepted that nearly everything we are told is most likely a lie, I began to relax. Like with convid. Some of the fairly 'awake' folk were still scrabbling around, doing their heads in, trying to sort out what was real and what was fantasy. I needed a few weeks to absorb it properly, but once I saw that it was all a grand hoax, this kind of tedious and endless analysis went out the window. 

Some people say that everything we are told is a lie. Actually, I don't agree with that. The mentality of psychopathic control freakery is not especially wedded to lying. Its addiction is found elsewhere. To the psychopathic mind, whether something is true or false is irrelevant. It has no morality, it doesn't care. What matters to this kind of mentality is the programme, the agenda. Everything it promotes is not necessarily a lie, but it is necessarily part of its programme, whatever that may be.

Thus, if something true fits the agenda, it will remain true in the emerging mainstream view of things. For example, if it's bloody hot in the Mediterranean for a while, this can be served up as it is. No need for lies. It will most likely get exaggerated or dramatised for extra effect, and its basic truth will get stirred into the 'great narrative', that we're all going to perish unless..... we build more wind farms. 

I rest my case. Putting aside false modesty, I propose that it is pretty much infallible.  

Images: 1. Birds near a wind farm; 2 and 3. The endangered North American Right Whale.