Part One: Belinus; A Near Miss

I was eagerly anticipating the visit to Rosslyn Chapel. It's not on the Belinus line, around 6 miles east of the great ley; but it is apparently a vital piece of the energy grid. Michael Feeley asserts that the Knights Templar performed powerful rituals in the Chapel, invoking high-level spiritual energies into the ley line system. In this way, energy was introduced and distributed throughout the globe. 

If you look at the literature, you will find Rosslyn Chapel frequently referred to as 'enigmatic'. I suppose that this means 'We don't really know what this place is about; we can't make sense of it at all.'

The architecture and decorative work is unique: a mix of traditional Christian and so-called pagan themes. It is intricate, designed in a rare harmony, and expressive at a time when such art style was being frowned upon, under the influence of Protestant 'reformation'.

The Knights Templar are also rather enigmatic. The story goes that they were founded as a kind of Christian defence unit, in order to protect Christians on pilgrimage during the Crusades, when their devotional hikes might take them through infidel (Muslim) lands.

Somewhere along the line, the Knights Templar turned up at the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem, where they apparently found something. From then on, they rapidly acquired great wealth and power, financing and establishing some of the great cathedrals and other religious places in western Europe. Names such as 'Temple' and 'Temple Bar' in the city of London bear witness to their great influence. Eventually, so we are told, some Pope got fed up with the (to him) excessive power of the Knights, so he had them disbanded, and some of them met a gruesome end. 

According to David Icke - in some of his earlier work, at least, for example 'Children of the Matrix' - the Templars did not really disappear, but simply went underground, whence their undercover influence continues until the present day. Their purpose, he says, is to protect and preserve one of the great reptilian bloodlines which have come to greatly control the direction of humanity over millennia.

This is a rough-and-ready summary, from memory; if you have any real interest, do your own research on this one, don't take it from me.

Anyhow, back to Rosslyn Chapel.....

The tickets were bought for the Monday, the hotel in Edinburgh selected. It's around an hour on the bus from the centre of the city to the Chapel, which lies just to the south. Monday arrived, and I spent the morning in a hotel bed with a migraine. The time for our visit approached, arrived, then went. Still I was in horizontal position. I don't travel well: still, at least migraines are largely confined to travelling ventures nowadays. Meanwhile, my wife strolled around the neighbourhood of the hotel. She is excellent at entertaining herself, and preferred to explore outside the front door and sit in the tepid late spring sun, rather than battle through town to go to the Chapel by herself.

That is the trip to mystical Rosslyn Chapel. It'll be there another time. Ars longa, vita brevis: it will surely outlive me. It may even outlive Tom Hanks....

Part Two: Inside the Lunatic Asylum

The Cabal, as we call it, along with its minions, has gone ape-shit crazy. It's in a hurry; sensing that more and more people are catching on to what's really going on, they are racing ahead, trying to get it irreversibly done-and-dusted before they all end up on the bonfire.

Bizarre things are happening on all fronts. Events which make no sense at all, which have no rational purpose, other than to put into place planet slave. It's only with this perspective that anyone can make head or tail of what's going on.

Take 'climate change', which has made an impressive comeback after a couple of convid-obsessed years. Even if you believe the CO2-is-killing-us-all narrative, it makes no sense. Take 15-minute cities. Does anybody in their right mind truly consider that controlling peoples' driving patterns in little towns in Lancashire and South Wales is going to make any difference?

Take energy sources. Does anybody in that same right mind think that more wind farms is going to make planet Earth a cleaner place?

Point one: the quantity of energy required to build a turbine is enormous. Point two: minerals required to make the things work are mined in China, and entire landscapes are devastated and polluted in the process. Point three: When the wind does not blow, back-up is needed, normally gas-fired (aaargh, CO2). Point four: When the wind blows too much, the turbines don't work properly. Point five: When there's just about the right amount of wind, there is the likelihood of a power surge, so the misgovernment pays the energy companies large sums of money to close down a turbine or two. Point six: Peatland areas, favoured locations in Scotland for turbines, are carbon sinks, the equivalent of tropical rainforest. When wind farms are constructed, peat areas are disrupted, releasing CO2 into the atmosphere.

Is that enough????.... 

Then you have 'Net zero'. This is ludicrous. For sure none of the people who came up with this ludicrous nonsense actually believe it can be achieved. But you see, they are in a hurry, in a bit of a panic. So we need to have ever-truncated aims to instil a sense of urgency. Net zero by 2050. No, let's make it 2045. No, 2035. No, let's make it next Friday. Bullshit, manufactured from thin air. 

It's the same with 'Agenda 2030'. Plenty of folk in the 'alternative' seem to be terrified by this oft-repeated doomsday of 2030. I wouldn't bother. It's just another ploy. Just a date plucked from nowhere. But if you repeat the lie often enough, people begin to believe in its reality - which in turn does actually help to bring the whole stupid thing into being. People begin to believe in its reality, begin to behave as if it's happening, it's inevitable. And then it may indeed happen. As David Icke never tires of telling us, everything is perception.

Then you've got the Netherlands. Not content with demonising CO2, there's another gremlin killing us now: nitrogen. Even someone who managed to doze their way through most of the chemistry lessons at school like me knows that nitrogen is plentiful, plentiful, plentiful. One of the main things on this planet. But in the Netherlands, apparently, it's poison. Their farmers, who are world leading producers of agricultural crops, are using too much. The Dutch farmers are killing us all. So they have to stop this productive stuff, and sell out, to the totalitarian misgovernment of nice, lovely, liberal Holland.

Large numbers of them are scheduled to be 'removed' from the land. They are not happy, and continue to protest. Probably not mentioned very much in the censorious mainstream, the Dutch misgovernment is in disarray. Falling to pieces. Great. May it spread like contagion over the rest of Europe....

Part Three: Burning Planet

Just in case you were wondering:

https://expose-news.com/2023/07/11/claims-that-uks-temperature-last-month-was-the-hottest/

Even putting aside considerations of deliberate data manipulation and hidden agendas, it is clear that making such definitive statements about weather conditions (and associated climatic trends) is nigh-on impossible.

There are a number of reasons, one of which concerns the siting of weather stations used to collect weather information. The results you get will depend on where you put the weather stations.

One of the factors concerns the urban heat island effect, which is universally accepted. Put simply, it tends to be hotter in a big city than in the surrounding countryside. Buildings and the energy released by human activity tend to do that. Note - big note - it has nothing to do with carbon dioxide, or any other gas....

So, imagine a country with ten weather stations a century ago, all in rural locations. Now it has twenty weather stations, with ten new ones built in cities; clearly comparing the national stats from the two periods of time will be incorrect, with a bias to heat in the later period. 

Similarly, if you built a load of new weather stations in southern England and none in the north, you will be getting results that are skewed towards warming: London is typically hotter than Manchester.

That data is manipulated and falsified is, in my view, a no-brainer. I know rather more about the USA than the UK in this respect. But in the USA widespread malpractice has taken place - all of which, coincidentally, increases the impression of global warming.....

There are many instances of recent data being rounded up: a maximum temperature of 15.7 degrees today gets rounded up to 16. That's very objective and scientific. Tony Heller of realclimatescience provides plenty of instances of past data just being changed, again always to create the effect of greater warming over time. He can show this because he accesses the original records and compares them to what is on parade today. They ain't always the same.

And, for large areas where there are no records, such as desert areas, they just make the data up! 

So this 'hottest month ever' stuff is largely propaganda. People in the UK may remember 'the hottest day ever', last year. What they may not know is that the weather station where this hottest day was recorded is situated right next to a runway on an airfield (hot tarmac, anyone?). And that the reading was taken a minute or two after a plane either landed or took off, I don't remember which. Ah, science......

And here's another little thing. A few weeks ago it was indeed pretty hot, even - or especially, it transpires - here in the Highlands of Scotland. The weather had also been unusually dry, and I had heard rumours of restrictions on water use. Wanting to check out the local situation, I searched online, and was taken to an article on the BBC website. It did, indeed, provide the information I was looking for. I was about the move on, when I spotted a heading at the top of the page. It was printed in red, and it said 'Climate Change'.

Er, excuse me. This article is not about climate change. It's about dry weather over the past few weeks in northern Scotland. And why do you always put these kind of 'categories' headings in red? Why not green? Why not yellow?

So this is the subliminal messaging that shit-houses like the BBC are putting out all the time. Why do they do it? If 'climate change' is a genuine threat, why do they feel the need to ram it down peoples' throats at every possible opportunity, and to drag all sorts of other situations into the climate change arena? After probably two decades of non-stop propaganda on the topic, you might think the public would have got the message by now. If the message was a credible one, that is.... 

Images: Interior of Rosslyn Chapel; a Knights Templar, apparently; what the Scottish Highlands should look like now, if St Greta was right; City life next week, according to climate alarmists (it's always next week, isn't it?)