Part One

From early 2020 I found myself embracing a far wider range of sources within the field of 'alternative' or 'independent' people and media than had been the case previously. Needs must, I suppose....

Since then, I have found a galaxy of courageous souls, prepared to sit up and speak what they consider to be truth, in the face of ridicule, and of opposition that refuses to actually discuss the matter at hand, instead just shouting names and insults at anybody who dares to question their own lunatic viewpoints. Just as the evil at work within human society has become more obvious over the past three years, so has its opposite come out into the open: truth, beauty, goodness, in abundance. Just as well, really.....

It has not escaped my attention that among the many brave and goodly folk out there are a fair number who will refer to themselves as being Christian. Only recently I watched an interview which went far down the particular rabbit hole of nanotechnology, synthetic biology, and what it is doing to the nature of the human species. One of the participants would from time to time mention the Bible, and reassure us by saying 'It's in Scripture'.

I confess to being unimpressed with such lip service to this particular collection of stories. You do not need to do much homework to realise that the Bible is probably the most censored, altered, deleted, revised, add-a-bit-here, take-a-bit-there piece of literature in western culture. And to see that those who have done the revising and deleting have not been working in the service of factual accuracy, of truth; they have done so in order that the Holy Book aligns with whatever psychological manipulations they wish to impose on the population at large. In short, the Bible has been a massive tool of mind control over the past two thousand years.

The 'alternative Christian' phenomenon is especially common among people from the USA. There are many Christians who, quite rightly, feel marginalised by a political milieu dominated by scientific materialism, an essentially atheistic and non-religious, non-spiritual, attitude. While for years the dominant ethos in society was Christian, now these people feel under attack. And they feel it because it's true. Their alienation has forced them into some kind of awakening, to see the nefarious agendas at work behind world events. But, I maintain, they inhabit a halfway house, sometime caught in a false dichotomy between scientistic atheism on the one hand, and religion in the form of Christianity on the other.

It's not a black-and-white situation. There are some good things scattered throughout its varied pages. But anybody in the world of 'alternative' information and media who looks to the Bible as their article of faith will have my overall confidence in them diluted. They may have seen through the lies of Fauci and Gates, but they have failed the test when it comes to matters of religion and the spirit. I suppose I find it a bit bizarre.

There are those who can read the Bible. These are few and far between, however. It seems to require a knowledge of the original meanings of words, numerology, preferably gematria, subjects that most of us remain in relative ignorance of. It is also a great advantage to be well versed in myths, legends, and stories from cultures through the ages and across the globe, in order to see that many of the themes in the Bible are not unique to this piece of literature at all, but are stories that are common to many different cultures. Ideas of uniqueness to the Bible are largely capital-letter bullshit.

Part Two

Here is an interesting person. Paul Wallis.

I'm not sure what his connection with any established church is today, but for many years he was right in there, including a spell as archdeacon in the Anglican Church in Australia. He has studied Bible texts closely, returning to the originals and, most significantly, looking at the original meanings of key words. Some of his conclusions may be surprising.

There was, according to Paul, a big redaction of the compilation of what we now know as the Old Testament around 500 BCE (interesting time, that: Buddha, Plato, etc....). At this time, stories were basically altered. It is only at this moment that the 'One God' as such really makes an appearance. He was introduced to bring unity to a disparate bunch of writings. In the original stories, much of the contact with 'higher forces', whence came revelation, inspiration, not to mention a load of tablets with stuff written on them, was not with 'the spirit of God' at all. It was with what we would now call ETs! So the visions of prophets are not of 'one God', but of forces or beings out there who are non-human and off-planet in origin. All of which rather alters, well, quite a lot....

Within this context, Paul also describes stories in the Old Testament which relate a theme common to many other ancient cultures scattered throughout the world: interference in human affairs by these non-human entities. This ET disruption includes hybridisation and genetic manipulation of humans by technologically advanced races. Not always, but typically, this tinkering amounts to  dumbing down humans. To reducing the human from being a whole, wise, sovereign being with a strong connection to higher dimensions; to rendering it mediocre, helpless, nothing more than a slave to the whims of non-human entities. Humans become less magnificent unique beings, but are diminished into farm animals, unknowingly living lives of slavery. This is the real fall of man..... 

Part Three

Perception is everything, as David Icke never tires of saying. It is your perception which creates the world you inhabit, and shapes the way you behave. If you can influence people's perception, you can mould their behaviour. This is the basis for manipulation of human life since time immemorial.

The predominant perception of the passing of human beings through time in modern western societies can be summed up in three words: evolution, progress, Darwin. How many times have you seen that diagram, outlining the development from a chimplike being, through ancient hairy hominids, to the current model, which stands upright and walks with its head held high? It's a constant reminder of our progress, our evolution Darwin-style. But how true is it, really? Not very much, I suggest...

I was in my mid-teens when I fostered an obsession with ancient mankind. I studied pretty much everything I could get my hands on. If I wanted to grapple with those great questions, 'Who am I?', 'What is human life all about?', I knew that I would need to explore where we came from. This would at the very least provide significant clues.

Even then, there was no agreement on the lineage of homo sapiens, despite the ever-growing fund of fossil finds to refer to. Today, little has changed. The 'missing link' remains elusive. Taken at face value, the fossil evidence does not tell a story of neat and linear 'development' or 'evolution' at all. Instead, it recounts the existence of considerable numbers of hominid types inhabiting different regions of the planet, sometimes coexisting in time and space. Maybe the missing link remains elusive because the missing link does not exist.

Interestingly, the notion of 'human progress' is only recent. In 'The Flowering of the Renaissance' Vincent Cronin describes how the thinkers and philosophers of the time remained wed to a notion that existence takes place in cycles rather than as a linear progression. This is the dominant model adopted by numerous cultures in the past, exemplified by the well-known Hindu description of the Yugas or cycles which the universe goes through; round and round, expanding, maintaining, decaying (needless to say we currently live in the Kali Yuga, the age of iron and of darkness and decay).

So, for the people of the time, the arts an sciences of the Renaissance represented, not so much anything new, any kind of development: instead, it was a renewal or restoration of the arts and knowledge of  Greek and Roman civilisation. This was how they saw things. 

The belief in the inevitable progress and betterment of humankind is ingrained deeply. There was one time when I was teaching English language to non-native speakers that I had an unusually interesting and interested group of students. Midday, room four; I remember it well. Being pretty 'advanced' students, they were capable of discussing serious matters of a social, political, and philosophical nature. It wasn't quite an advanced conspiracy class, but some of the students were perceptive and critical an a way that was not typical.

After many such discussions concerning the issues and difficulties of modern life, I asked the question: "Who considers that the world is becoming better?" To my amazement, nearly all the students raised their hand. This 'conclusion' went completely against the grain of most of the discussions that we had had. I failed to follow up this majority decision any further. I wish I had. In the meantime, Darwin breathed a sigh of relief, and went to look at some more tortoises.

Maybe we've been sold a lie, the mother of all lies. A lie about the very nature and origins of who we are. A lie which provides cover for the truth about human beings. All the time, we are fed the idea of 'progress' and the onward march of mankind; while in reality humanity has been diminished, reduced, while engaged in a constant struggle to maintain a semblance of its own greater potential. The idea of progress of civilisation flies in the face of much evidence; but it's the story that's told and regurgitated.

How different would human beings feel and behave if they recognised that they were not the pinnacle of existence, but had been messed around, manipulated, hybridised, by non-humans who did not exactly have humanity's best interests at heart. It would be a more humble species, in a positive sense; also less naive, deluded. It may even be determined to put the record straight, and to recover what could be its birthright. For sure, it would see itself and its place in the cosmos completely differently.

It's the truth that must be hidden whatever the cost....

Notes: For Paul Wallis, see https://paulanthonywallis.com

He also has a channel on (NotFor)You Tube, called the 5th kind. Actually, the most magical interviews with him that I have watched are on Ickonic. You need to follow a few of the links on his website to get to the meat of the matter.

Art Images: Annunciation, by Carlo Crivelli. Is the 'virgin birth' the result of artificial hybrid insemination by high-tec ETs?

                   Miracle of the Snow, by Da Panicale. Lenticular clouds or UFOs?

                   Blake's Albion