Part One

On November 3rd this year David Icke was on his way to the Netherlands. He was able to do this because, in common with nearly all other European countries, Holland has quietly dropped its need-a-jab, need-a-test requirements in order for people to enter. 

He was due to deliver a thirty-minute speech at a peace rally in Amsterdam on the Sunday. En route, however, he received a communication about his proposed visit from some authorities in Holland. He was banned. And, taking their lead from the noble Dutchmen, 26 other nations in Europe, including all in the Schengen bloc, decided to ban him as well, for the next two years.

What dastardly crimes had Icke committed in order to receive such an imposition? Well, according to official sources, his presence in the Netherlands could lead to public disturbance, especially by provoking anti-Ickers. And he wasn't welcome because of his anti-semitism and for being a holocaust denier. Sounds pretty serious... 

It goes without saying that this is all tedious and predictable bullshit. Do you know how tiring and boring I find the pathetic activities of cabal slaves? They didn't want David Icke to come and give a speech about the things he gives speeches on. That's it. End of story. You need to invent a reason, and the charge of anti-semitism is as sure-fire as any really. Who wants an anti-semite giving speeches in their city?

'Public disturbance' holds no water. The Dutch misgovernment's measures against the farming community in Holland (involving reducing nitrogen, which has joined CO2 on the no-no list) have provoked public disturbances for much of this year. This has included farmers blocking motorways and other disruptive behaviour. Unfortunately, nobody has banned the Dutch government from Holland for two years for provoking public disturbance. Funny, that.

Part Two

Icke, the normal view: ridiculed by Terry Wogan; mad conspiracy theorist; reptilians; anti-semitic. Sounds deep, doesn't it?

Unlike the dark entities who consider it their right to decide who can and cannot go where and when, I do actually know a bit about David Icke. Unlike those entities, I have actually read what he has to say. Four of his books, to be exact, over the last three years. Given the subject matter, and the fact that a typical Icke tome runs to over 500 pages, not an inconsiderable undertaking. I reasonably consider myself better informed about David's work than any of these beings who make statements about other peoples' lives.

Anti-semitism: it's a grave accusation. Let's look at anti-semite Dave. Let's see what he actually has to say about the touchy subjects of zionism, anti-semitism, Israel, Jews. Fasten your seatbelts...

Icke has written extensively on the subject over the years, but a good summary of his research can be found in a fairly recent book, dating to 2017, 'Everything you need to know but have never been told'.   

The vast mass of today's Jews does not, according to David Icke, come from Israel at all. They originate in Khazaria, which is modern-day southern Russia and Georgia. On the collapse of the Khazarian Empire, they moved out to places such as Poland, Ukraine, and Germany. "Their historical connection to biblical Israel is basically zilch."

Zionism is not a religion, but an invention of the Rothschilds. It has little or nothing to do with ordinary Jews. "Jewish people as a whole are as irrelevant to these Zionist insiders as the rest of the global population." And regarding Jews in the USA: "... only a small section of the Jewish community.... knowingly serves... the secret society, and it is these initiates that appear in dramatically higher ratio to their number in politics.... banking, business, Hollywood, media."  

It would be reasonable to deduce that David Icke sees the majority of Jewish people in no different a position to the majority of other humans on the planet: they are unknowingly manipulated and exploited by a small number of dark entities. They are pawns in a game that is beyond their comprehension. Cannon fodder for the cabal, the controllers, call them what you will. What is presented to them as for their benefit is actually to the contrary. 

An example of this is how Israel was at the forefront of the programme for giving the populace the convid shots, right at the beginning of 2021. There may have been some Israelis who genuinely believed this was great; further proof of what a progressive nation they inhabited. But the reality is that they were the original global guinea pigs for a 'fake vaxene' (Icke always includes the word 'fake'), the effects of which were unknown and unknowable, given the absence of proper trials and testing. It was a remarkably reckless and apparently irresponsible move on the part of the Israeli authorities (some of whom, no doubt, knew what they were up to), not the kind of thing you unleash upon a nation whose welfare you truly care about. 

Such speculations lead us into the truly murky waters of World War Two. Persecution of Jews by Germans. Was it really just a case of a bunch of Nazis with a thing about Jewish folk? Is that it? Or was the whole horror show somehow stage-managed from behind the scenes, with (ordinary) Germans and (ordinary) Jews both hapless pawns in a psychopathic programme of geopolitical change, focussed on the 'necessity' of creating a secure homeland for the Jews who are still alive? All of this as a facade for developing a cabal stronghold on the east Mediterranean coast? Just musing, don't really know, but.....

Part Three

This also leads into an interesting perspective on the oft-quoted expression: 'You can tell who is in control by whom you are not allowed to criticise.' This is not always true, as the example of Jews demonstrates. Sometimes it is a case of 'You can tell who is part of the controllers' agenda by whom you are not allowed to criticise.'

Example: today, you are not allowed to criticise transgender people. Now, the politicians, authorities, controllers from the top to the bottom, don't give a monkeys about transgender folk. It's simply that the transgender movement is useful for them at this particular stage of their agenda roll-out. Once done, they will throw the gender-fluid and gender-confused in the trash bin, just as they have feminists and women, who are no longer needed for the plan.

See what's happened to the feminist movement over the past twenty years. Those who were once revered, those who stood up for women, or at least think they do, like Germaine Greer and Mrs Harry Potter, are viciously criticised in the mainstream now. Women are trash, despised. No longer needed. And the majority of Jews are the same. One day, they too will become surplus to requirements. 

Part Four 

If it was just Icke being banned, it wouldn't be so bad. In fact, too much focus on this one particular case can become a diversion from the reality, that legions of people have had their work and opinions deleted from mainstream discourse, especially over the past three years.

Nurses who have devoted decades of their lives to patients, censored from facebook because they dared to say that hospitals weren't teeming with people dying from convid. Long-standing doctors questioning the wisdom of the experimental waxenes. Scientists pointing out the potential dangers to life. These are not evil people. They were simply reporting their fears and observations. Why on earth would you want to censor them? Unless you had a whole lot to hide....

Other topics leading to 'being disappeared' included questioning the accuracy of the USA election results two years ago. The agents of darkness are perpetually attempting to widen the range of their authoritarian activities. Gender, climate change, you name it: anything that is part of the 'programme' is fair game.

We live in a highly censored society; it's just that most people don't know. The simple reason for this is because they don't know to look for that information in the first place. You don't go searching for what you don't realise exists. Such is the way that censorship is truly effective.

We stand on the cusp of evermore draconian measures. There has been the recent high drama of the Alex Jones show trial in the USA. Alex is a fairly high-profile and long-standing presenter of 'alternative news'. I've never been a fan, but that's not relevant. How many billion dollars (literally) does he owe in fines at the last count? All as a consequence of saying certain things about the Sandy Hook shootings quite a while ago now.

It's a completely surreal scenario, but the intention is obvious. It is to strike fear and hesitation into dissenters. Anybody challenging the official narrative is playing a dangerous game: this is the message. Question us at your peril. 

A sickening experience was to wander over to the online pages of the Guardian and Independent propaganda machines (some people call them newspapers). I was curious to see what they had to say about the Alex Jones affair, but I was unprepared for what was awaiting me. The comments were overwhelmingly approving of his punishment, and in favour of doing whatever is necessary to rid the planet of the scourge of 'conspiracy theorists'. Long-standing writer Simon Jenkins had a piece about dealing with these wicked conspiracy people, or something like that, I couldn't be bothered to remember such vile crap accurately.

The mean and narrow minds of the Guardian and Independent clearly see fit to squash any notions that diverge from the official version of events. Many people who read these horrible publications consider themselves liberal, progressive, and the like. What they are actually supporting is a kind of information fascism. An outlawing of anything other than a single officially-approved narrative. The end of discussion, debate, open opinions. They are supporting the end of the line for humanity. no less. Think about it......     

There is a petition against Icke's ban. It's already been hacked once, it seems, and lots of signatures have disappeared. Please sign, folks... https://www.freedavidicke.eu