Part One: Playing the Polarity

With the advent of the Ukrainian thing, the unwary are invited for yet another turn on the not-so merry-go-round of 'Good guys, bad guys'. It's a game which comes with infinite variations, but always grounds itself in low frequency duality, and goes on into an indefinite future. The dynamic is simple: the game continues while people persist in playing, and the rules are easy. In fact, you need to do nothing at all. No thought to be wasted, no decisions to make. You see, the choice as to who is the good guy and who is the bad has already been made for you.

A good deal of the 'alternative media' appears to lack the perspective - the spiritual breadth and depth, we could say - to see that the good guy and the bad guy may indeed just be two heads of the same infernal monster. In order to stay in their comfort zone, some simply reverse the roles, declaring Mr Putin to be the good guy, not the bad.

There are, it must be said, mitigating circumstances for Mr Putin's actions, to say the least. Viz:

- The conflict is nothing new. It has been going since 1991; see the video with Nikita Mikhalkov linked in the previous blog. - The Ukrainian military has been waging war on its own citizens, the predominantly Russian-speaking people of Donbass, for a number of years, with an estimated 10000 civilian deaths. - The agreement that Ukraine be a buffer zone between Russia and western Europe has been effectively breached by western interests. As an example, by tampering in the uprising that led to Zelensky becoming President in the first place. And fundamentally by moves to make Ukraine a member of NATO, an extremely provocative act.

And that's not all: - There is the issue of the Azov neo-Nazis, who seem tolerated by the Ukraine govnt and western interests. They appear to be akin to medieval butchers, terrible people. - There are the alleged biolabs. I don't know personally.

All of which add up to the Ukraine being a puppet state of western interests, who have been involved in an undercover and underhand takeover.

There are only two sources which I regularly visit that have consistently maintained the standard of avoiding the 'good guys, bad guys' trap. These are David Icke and Cosmic Agency.

David has steadfastly stuck to his guns. 'Why take sides when both are part of the same web?' is his perspective. He did it with Trump, when all manner of Qanons and lookalikes were trumpeting Trump as the saviour of humankind. And he is doing the same with Putin. In one layer of reality there appears to be opposition, but go high enough and you discover they are all party to the same club.

There are a number of recent videos on Cosmic Agency that point to the degree to which it is all theatre, a tragi-pantomime put on in order to achieve certain nefarious cabal-style ends. There is fighting, there are people getting killed, there are refugees. But not the way that the mainstream media of infinite lies is telling it.

There is, in my view, one simple convincing piece of evidence that assigns Putin and Trump to the cabal bin, and it is this. Both had it within their power to stop the plandemic roll-out, but neither of them did so. All the proof was there for anyone who wished or dared to look, it wasn't difficult to do. They could have had the whole shithouse come tumbling down. But they didn't. Instead, they both endorsed lockdowns, masks and, most crucially, the fake vaxx being injected into all and sundry. All of this being part of a programme of transformation of humankind, transhumanism if you like, increased tyrannical global control, and a degree of depopulation. They could have brought it down, but they gave their support and assent.

The other damning episode with regards to Trump is the most recent US election. Once more, the evidence was there, staring you in the face if only you dared look: fraud, election rigging was rife, above all in the computer systems used for vote counting. Trump could at least have seriously challenged the result. In so doing, however, he would have been bringing into question the entire foundation of 'democracy' in the west. Once more, the whole system would have been exposed; once more, he failed to do so. Instead he just slouched off. Sorry, Q and similar apologists, your time is up. 'Just waiting  for the right time to reveal his true colours. Just waiting for people to wake up and see the evidence.' Just waiting for this, just waiting for that. Bullshit.

Case closed, I'd say.    

Part Two: Memories

One of the more out-there topics that has cropped up on Cosmic Agency is that of Memory Implants. Not all of your memories, it is stated, may truly be your memories. Some may have been implanted into your consciousness without your knowing. Rather surprisingly, this might be done for beneficial purposes. The 'memories' are inserted in alignment with your soul's prime aim or aims in this life, to help clarify that direction and to bring coherence to this lifetime. It is also mooted elsewhere that memory implants can be utilised for nefarious objectives, to provoke a belief or action based upon a false sense of reality.

Not the kind of thing that you learn about at school. Be this as it may, I recently decided to take the matter seriously, and to experiment with the notion of memories being implanted. It's all been very interesting. First up, though, the life story memories....

The idea of the life story project that features on this blog was conceived quite a while ago. The bulk of the text was written in draft form three or four years ago.

Despite its sometimes chaos and confusion, the period focussed on for this project has exerted a strong hold on me, and I have felt a certain fondness for it. During those commune years, I felt, I had been authentically 'me'; whatever that might turn out to mean.

During the course of working with, re-living to an extent, these memories, a curious thing has happened. The memories have taken on a different quality. What were once rather solid, fixed 'things' inhabiting my mind have taken on a far more plastic and fluid quality. Rather than being building blocks for my identity, they now appear more like a dream theatre, simple flitting in and out of consciousness.

It seems as if, while my own life has moved on - which means the consciousness has to some extent transformed - these memories from the past are are no longer so much part of the 'story' that is now 'me'. They are less congruent, less events which form a neat linear pattern of experiences that lead inexorably to the 'now'. I have less of an 'ah, that's me' response to the events that float through my mind, and to which I attach the notion of 'memories'.

Considering the possibility of memory implants has a similar effect. Those memories that were once so much part of who I am, or who I was (leading to who I am now) take on a more numinous and provisional quality. Memories become little more than certain mental events which come and go within consciousness, but with which 'I' am far less identified and attached. Don't hang on, don't reject; just allow them to come and go.

There are times in life when establishing ones personal identity may be necessary: who am I, where do I come from; what do I like and dislike, what do I believe and agree with; what do I disbelieve and take as untruth. The moment arrives, however, when such an identity becomes an impediment, and needs to be seen through or dismantled. 

So, these experiences with memories along with the destruction of belief in their fixed and rigid nature represents something of a release from the stranglehold that the past may have upon the present. More than this, it can be a portal into timelessness itself. Preoccupation and identification with memories anchors us in the limited framework of past- present - future.

'Moving on' means leaving this behind, or at the very least loosening its grip. 'Past' and 'future' dissolve, but so does 'present'. 'Being in the now', 'being mindful in the present', the kind of stuff lauded by the modern 'mindfulness of now' craze, still remains firmly rooted in linear time. All it has done is to take one aspect of the past - present - future model and taken it as the reality.

There is somewhere (the Diamond Sutra, possibly, but I don't remember) where Buddha says that the past does not exist, since it has gone. The future does not exist because it has not arrived. And the present does not exist, because it's slippery and impossible to get hold of.

There is no need for living in the present. It's an illusory idea.     

Images:

R. Fludd, Philosophia Sacra, 1626

Akashic Records, starseed twins.