Part One: Winners and Losers

A friend wrote to me recently, asking who I thought was winning and who was losing. He was referring, not to Ukraine but primarily to the plandemic and to the Cabal in general. I didn't have much to say to him at the time but, as is often the case, the question was left to be absorbed and digested. I felt that it was a good one.

First up, I guess we need to decide who the players are in this game of win and lose; and what 'winning' and 'losing' mean anyway. 

The fact remains that the majority of humans still fail to recognise the possibility that they are slap bang in the middle of a deadly game of winners and losers at all. Despite an increase in cognitive dissonance for many, they continue under the fatal illusion that everybody is in this together, and they're all jolly good chaps who've been doing their best to get the better of the deadly pathogen, end of story.

If it is a war, it is a world war. And this one is truly global. How long does a world war last? Four years, six years? Except that it never really ends. Not until now, that is.

So those who at least entertain the possibility that we are at war may reasonably ask who the combatants are. The Cabal versus the rest of humanity, some will say. The Cabal, along with its host of willing agents in the worlds of politics, economics, law, health, media, and education, that is.

Not so, I suggest. If there is a war, it is a war on humanity, not against humanity. Every move, every strategy, is to the detriment of the peace and well-being of humans. Yet it is not a war against humanity as such. Their soul is the prize of the fight, and they are simply long-suffering bystanders.   

More exactly, the war is between the Cabal and those who are, to varying degrees, awake; some may say the starseeds. Those who are awake to the situation, and who refuse to comply with the life-destroying edicts of the dark ones, are the obstacles to total Cabal takeover. They are humanity's only hope for 'salvation'.

So who is winning and who is losing? Both 'sides' are advancing. The Cabal's programme or agenda continues to be rolled out, just as predicted by those who could see what was going on eighteen months ago. They will continue regardless, because that's what they decided to do, and are determined to do it. The process will continue unless or until it reaches an unmoveable obstacle.

Simultaneously, the number of people awake to, or even highly suspicious of, what is going on has increased enormously over the past year. Despite the damage that has been inflicted, most of these people will feel considerably more optimistic about the possibilities for the future than they did twelve months ago.

One thing for sure, in my view: things have not all been going the way that the top dogs wanted. The whole idea of convid and whatever follows is that it is a somewhat quiet transformation. A stealth war, whereby people are brought under control by their own consent. A mix of mind-control, fear, masks, staying indoors, shots, unfortunate by-products such as independent businesses collapsing, was to usher in change which the majority of people believed to be for their own good.

Much of this was blown away by the fallout from the truckers' convoy in Canada. The Cabal showed its true face, which is vicious, brutal, ugly. Probably most people don't get to see them, so fixated on false sources of information that they are; but a goodly number of folk will nevertheless have looked at pictures of 'police' in Canada dressed up like Stasi members, moving in military-fashion, beating peaceful people, trampling them underfoot with horses. This in Canada, probably the most decent and civilised nation on Earth in the minds of many people.

And then Trudeau kicks in with emergency powers. Hang on, who's attacking Canada? Oh, a bunch of blokes in lorries, camped out in the capital city, and people partying in the frozen outdoors. OK.

Then came freezing bank accounts. Let's use plain language: 'You can't get your money.' You can't buy food for your family; you'll get kicked out of your house and into the Canadian winter because you can't pay the rent. This is what Trudeau and his WEF-owned buddies in government are prepared to do should you dare to speak out and refuse to consent to any bunch of idiocy thrown your way.

The other mega-blunder of Trudeau was to show how easy it is to cut off the funds of anybody who you happen not to like. In a remarkable move that was as authoritarian as it was simple, he unwittingly revealed to the world (or at least to those members of the global community who have eyes to see) the vision of the future of the lords of darkness. The notorious digital identity card, or chip, or mark, or precisely whatever form the summary of your existence may take. Track someone, and punish or reward accordingly. It's not difficult to do, we are nearly there, as Trudeau showed when he blinked. This is the future according to the agenda: comply, or else. No fun, no travel, no nothing. It happens already in China, I am told.  

Trudeau really gave the game away. This is nasty, vicious, brutal. Comply or else. 'The bad guys are really the good guys' somebody wrote recently, referring to how the mad actions of the Trudeaus of the world are what will really wake people up from their slumber. It could have been better, but I think Trudeau did a pretty good job there. His efforts have been repeated this week in New Zealand by another product of the WEF school for global leaders, Jabinda Ardern, though to less publicity worldwide.

So the Cabal is resorting to old-fashioned strong-arm tactics in the face of increasing opposition. Desperately attempting to stoke the fires of divide and rule, and divide, divide, divide again. Every time, more people see through the veils of lies, and that something else entirely is going on.

The mentality was laid out fifty years ago by Jim Morrison, in a song entitled 'The Spy', should anybody wish to check it out.

Part Two: You Crane!   

I was at the supermarket check-out about a week ago. The man in front of me was jumping around and waving a 'newspaper' about in front of the check-out woman. They were talking when she should have been scanning his tins of beans. I was in no hurry, didn't mind.

Eventually it was my turn. "It's terrible what's happening in Ukraine, isn't it? Terrible." Oh dear; I only came in here for potatoes and bananas. "I don't know much about it, really" I proffered in all honesty. "They've invaded Ukraine. It's on the news. That Putin's a nutter." "I don't believe everything they say on the news" I volunteered. The check-out woman stopped scanning in her tracks. A steely expression came over her face. "I think there's more to things than we're told. It's not that simple." I felt obliged to clarify a little further. A dark cloud appeared over checkout number five, with relations as frosty as anything the Cold War of the '80s could conjure. I examined my receipt to make sure she hadn't charged me double.

One of the things that keeps the wheel of chaos, confusion, and never-ending suffering going round and round and round is the 'good guys, bad guys game'. It's a kneejerk reaction provoked by any supposed conflict: who's the good guy, who's the bad guy? Having decided the answer to the question, we feel safe in our understanding, and take sides accordingly.

Looked at from a slightly more metaphysical standpoint, this is heavy-duty dualistic thinking in action. It's a way of interpreting the world. Opposites, dualities, in perpetual conflict and strife. It's what makes the world go round - literally. It's this which leads to continued rebirth in the same old rubbishy, pained situations; but maybe that's another story.....

But to realise that it's not all bad guys, good guys, represents an advancement spiritually. Reality is at the very least far more nuanced. It arises, as Buddhism puts it, in dependence on conditions, a myriad of conditions. Maybe it's not a case of good guy, bad guy, but instead two pretty bad guys - which is a closer interpretation of what we have playing out in Ukraine just now. Dig deeper, and the two bad guys might actually be joined at the hip; dig a little deeper, and each is being run from precisely the same place as the other. Maybe it's more of a theatre designed to further an agenda, planned and calculated. Fear, panic: more of the same.

It is somewhat disheartening to find that, after two years of relentless fear-mongering, stress, manipulations and deceptions, so many people have learned precisely - nothing. They still swallow whatever is thrown at them from the television screen or the front page of a 'newspaper', without asking a single question or without the merest doubt being cast. I find it remarkable, but there you go..... 

Part Three: Renouncing Belief    

I guess that I sometimes may give the impression that I have a whole bucketload of beliefs and fixed opinions. The reality is different. I don't know a lot. I do, however, entertain a wide variety of possibilities. This is partly out of curiosity, and partly because the orthodox views, and those readily taken as 'truth', are so often found wanting. Wishing to truly 'know' means looking outside the box, and sometimes well outside the box. 

Neil Kramer used to say that you actually need very few beliefs in order to live perfectly well. He would actively encourage people to drop beliefs, even temporarily, as an experiment. You could dispense with attitudes, he suggested. Let go of the notions of 'obligation' and 'duty', for example. He said that there would probably be little change in what you actually did. However, instead of acting out of an unnecessary sense of duty, you just phoned up your granny because you wanted to, you felt the wish. Neil's practice also had the effect (without people realising it) of shifting their focus for living from intellect-based notions to heart-and-soul direct sensings of what is right and true and good. Brilliant. 

In his book 'Shambala: The Sacred Path of the Warrior', Tibetan Buddhist Chogyam Trungpa dispenses with the lists of ethical do's and don'ts that are often associated with Buddhism. Instead, he exhorts the would-be warrior to practice 'basic goodness'. I find a lot of wisdom in his approach. He is encouraging us to listen to our inner ear, or inner voice, and act from an innate intelligence and 'goodness'. 

Listen to basic goodness, and answers to problems will become immediately apparent, without their needing to go through the filter and censorship associated with 'rational understanding'. The main issue is that most people who have grown up within 'western civilisation' have had this instinct for goodness systematically eroded. They will need to start from the beginning, and learn to 'listen'. Then - and only then - will they be able to make sense of topics like convid and the Ukraine.

Links:

The point about Ukraine is that people are being played. I am not doubting that horrible things are happening to some folk there, but the situation is a theatre for manipulation of the global population, whose sense of sympathy is exploited mercilessly. Why was the same sense of outrage not whipped up for the quarter of a million people who died in the conflicts in Colombia c1995 to the present day? Why did the mainstream media ignore the several million (nobody really knows how many - but hey, it's just a bunch of Africans in the jungle, isn't it?) dead in the D.R. of Congo? Why is there no outrage about the 10000 civilisations killed in the Ukraine (mainly in the east) in recent times by the Ukrainian military? Simple questions, simple answers.   

https://off-guardian.org/2022/02/27/7-fake-news-stories-coming-out-of-ukraine/

https://21stcenturywire.com/2022/02/27/henningsen-on-gb-news-western-media-politicians-are-clueless-on-ukraine/

I have always had time for Patrick Henningsen since the Syrian war debacle. While everyone else was spewing propaganda and more clueless opinion, he actually went to Syria - took his Easter holidays there, if I remember right - to see what was really going on. He is that rarest of species, a proper journalist.